| |
|
|
|
| For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles. |
|
|
|
Table 9.8
Major Export Markets of Pakistan
(% Share)
| Country | 90-91 |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
| USA | 10.8 |
12.8 |
13.9 |
14.4 |
16.2 |
15.5 |
17.7 |
20.5 |
21.8 |
| Germany | 8.9 |
7.1 |
7.8 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
6.6 |
| Japan | 8.3 |
8.3 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
| UK | 7.3 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
7.8 |
7.1 |
6.4 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
6.6 |
| Hong Kong | 6.0 |
7.3 |
6.6 |
7.3 |
6.6 |
9.1 |
9.4 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
| Dubai | 2.8 |
4.4 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
4.0 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
5.4 |
| Saudi Arabia | 3.6 |
4.3 |
4.7 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
| Sub-Total | 47.7 |
50.8 |
52.8 |
55.3 |
50.3 |
51.5 |
54.7 |
52.5 |
53.4 |
| Other Countries | 52.3 | 49.2 | 47.2 | 44.7 | 49.7 | 48.5 | 45.3 | 47.5 | 46.6 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Source: Pakistan's Foreign Trade Key Indicators, Ministry of
Commerce, Islamabad
The combination of a narrow export base concentrated in low value added products and going
to few countries is a source of serious concern for Pakistan. In essence, no trade policy
changes or sophisticated policy implementation schemes will play a significant role in
increasing exports if the country's export base retains its current status. What is
required instead, is a major focus on Pakistan's competitive strength and a consequent
diversification of its export base and upgrading of its productive capacity. Trade policy
reforms and appropriate implementation programmes will then be able to facilitate an
export expansion strategy based on sound fundamentals.
Import Trends
Imports during the first nine years of the decade of the 1990s (1990-91 to 1998-99) grew
at an average rate of 4.3 percent per annum. The annual average growth rate during the
first half of the decade (1990-91 to 1994-95) was 9.3 percent while in the next four years
it declined to an annual average rate of 1.8 percent. However, the average decline during
the last three years (1996-97 to 1998-99) was much sharper at about 7 percent per annum.
The decline in 1998-99 was to the extent of 6.8 percent which was mainly due to the import
compression policy pursued during the year to protect the country's foreign exchange
reserves in the aftermath of economic sanctions. The idea was to discourage non-essential
imports. The trend in imports since 1990-91 are given in Table 9.9.
Table 9.9
Trend in Imports
| Year | $ Million | % Change |
| 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 July-April 1998-99 99-2000* 90-91 to 98-99 90-91 to 94-95 95-96 to 98-99 96-97 to 98-99 |
7,619 9,252 9,941 8,564 10,394 11,805 11,894 10,118 9,432 7,516 8,337 - - - - |
9.9 21.4 7.4 -13.8 21.4 13.6 0.7 -14.9 -6.8 -11.2 10.9 Average Growth 4.3 9.3 -1.8 -7.0 |
* Provisional
Source: Federal Bureau of Statistics
Imports during the current fiscal year (July-April 1999-2000) have registered an increase
of 10.9 percent as against a decline of 11.2 percent in the comparable period of last
year, increasing from $ 7516.0 million to $ 8337.1 million. The rise in imports was mainly
attributed to the higher imports of petroleum group (93.3%), agri/other chemicals group
(11.9%), metal group (10.5%) and 'others' (13.5%). On the other hand, the imports of food
group and machinery group have declined by 32.0 percent and 7.8 percent respectively. The
decline in food group is the outcome of massive fall in both quantity and value of imports
of wheat, soyabean & palm oil, sugar and tea. The decline in machinery group has
resulted from substantial fall (41.3%) in the import of power generating machinery.
However, within the machinery group, the imports of textile machinery and agricultural
machinery showed a rise of 10.9 percent and 5.4 percent respectively. The unit values of
imports, both for petroleum products and petroleum crude, have increased by 76.3 percent
and 91.6 percent respectively, thereby pushing the import bill up by $ 1049.3 million. If
the petroleum group is excluded from the overall imports, the remaining non-oil imports
have shown a negative growth of 3.6 percent [See Table-9.10]. Hence, the increase in
imports was purely POL driven. Excluding food and petroleum groups, the remaining imports
have registered a growth of 4.3 percent.
Table 9.10
Structure of Imports
($ Million)
July-April |
|||
| Commodity | 1999-2000* |
1998-99 |
Growth (%) |
| A. Food Group Wheat Soyabean Oil Palm Oil Sugar Pulses B. Machinery Group Power Gen. Machines Textile Machinery Electric. Mach. & App. Const. & Mining Mach. Agri. Machinery C. Petroleum Group D. Textile Group Synthetic Fiber E. Agri/Other Chemicals Group Fertilizer F. Metal Group Iron & Steel G. Miscellaneous Group H. Others Total Excluding Petroleum Group Excl. Food and Petroleum Groups |
946.9 |
1391.5 |
-32.0 4.7 |
* Provisional
Source: FBS, Islamabad
Imports - Gains/Losses
Pakistan gained $ 321.9 million because of the fall in import prices of items like soybean
oil, palm oil, synthetic fiber, medicinal products and iron & steel but these gains
were out weighted by the losses incurred due to an increase in the import prices of wheat,
petroleum products, crude petroleum and plastic material, which amounted to $ 1041.1
million. Had the unit value of these imports remained at the last year's level, the
imports of these items would have been lower by $ 719.2 million and the import growth
would have been 1.4 percent instead of 10.9 percent as reported earlier. Details are given
in Table-9.11.
Table 9.11
Gains/Losses of Imports
(July-April, 1999-2000 *)
($ Million)
| S.No. | Commodity |
Actual Imports |
Imports at last year's prices |
Gains |
Losses |
| 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
Wheat Soyabean Oil Palm Oil Petroleum Products Petroleum Crude Synthetic Fiber Plastic Material Medicinal Products Iron & Steel Total |
274.8 |
243.9 |
- |
30.9 |
* Provisional
Source: FBS & E.A.Wing, Finance Division
Month-Wise Imports
Monthly imports during July-April, 1999-2000 have been higher than the corresponding
months of last year with the exception of April, 2000. Imports averaged $ 834.5 million
per month during the first ten months of the current fiscal year, as against $ 751.6
million of the comparable period of last year. In other words, on average, imports have
been higher by $ 82.9 million per month. The quarter-wise estimates suggest that imports
grew by 15.9 percent in the first quarter (July-September), slowed to 8.1 percent in the
second quarter (October-December), accelerated to 15.9 percent in the third quarter
(January-March) but declined by 5.6 percent in April, 2000. The month and quarter-wise
imports are given in Table 9.12.
Table 9.12
Month-Wise Imports
($ Million)
| Month | 1999-2000 |
1998-99 |
% Change |
| July August September October November December January February March April * Average 1st Qtr (Jul-Sep) 2nd Qtr (Oct-Dec) 3rd Qtr (Jan-Mar) |
797.3 |
692.4 |
15.1 |
* Provisional
Source: FBS, Islamabad
Concentration of Imports
Pakistan's imports are highly concentrated in few items namely, fertilizer, petroleum
& products, machinery, transport equipments, edible oil, chemicals, iron & steel
and tea. These eight categories of imports, on average, accounted for about 75 percent of
total imports in the first nine years of the 1990s. Among these categories, petroleum
& products, machinery and chemicals accounted for almost 53 percent of total imports.
Considerable structural changes have taken place in some categories of imports over time.
The principal changes have taken place in the case of petroleum & petroleum products,
edible oil and chemicals. While the share of the former has declined, the shares of the
later two categories have increased during the 1990s [See Table 9.13]
Table 9.13
Pakistan's Major Imports
(Percentage Share)
| Commodities | 90-91 |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
Average |
| Fertilizer | 3.5 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
1.2 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
2.1 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
| Petroleum & Products | 22.2 |
15.0 |
15.5 |
16.1 |
15.3 |
16.8 |
19.0 |
15.5 |
15.5 |
16.8 |
| Machinery* | 20.5 |
27.0 |
24.3 |
22.0 |
22.8 |
21.6 |
23.1 |
18.9 |
17.8 |
22.0 |
| Transport Equipments | 6.7 |
9.0 |
12.5 |
9.7 |
5.9 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
5.7 |
7.1 |
| Edible Oil | 5.3 |
4.4 |
5.9 |
5.7 |
9.6 |
7.3 |
5.1 |
7.6 |
8.7 |
6.6 |
| Chemicals | 12.8 |
13.1 |
12.5 |
14.4 |
14.0 |
15.6 |
13.4 |
15.7 |
16.6 |
14.2 |
| Iron & Steel | 3.3 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
| Tea | 2.2 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
| Sub-Total | 76.5 |
76.7 |
78.5 |
77.0 |
74.2 |
74.4 |
73.5 |
70.0 |
72.6 |
74.8 |
| Others | 23.5 |
23.3 |
21.5 |
23.0 |
25.8 |
25.6 |
26.5 |
30.0 |
27.4 |
25.2 |
| Total | 100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
* excluding transport equipments
Source: Pakistan's Foreign Trade Key Indicators, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad
Economic Classification of Imports
The composition of Pakistan's imports have undergone little changes over time. The shares
of consumer goods and raw material for capital goods have remained almost unchanged during
the 1990s. While the share of raw material for consumer goods have increased only
marginally, the share of capital goods imports in total imports has fluctuated.
During the first nine months (July-March, 1999-2000) of the current fiscal year, the share
of raw material for consumer goods has increased from 47 percent to 53 percent while that
of raw material for capital goods remained stagnant at 6 percent. The share of capital
goods declined significantly from 31 percent to 26 percent but the share of consumer goods
declined marginally. The annual details since 1990-91 to 1999-2000 (July-March) are given
in Table-9.14. As stated earlier, the composition of Pakistan's imports have changed only
marginally.
Table 9.14
Economic Classification of Imports
(Rs. Million)
|
Raw Material For |
||||||||
| Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
Consumer Goods | Consumer Goods |
||||||
Total Imports |
Value |
%Share |
Value |
%Share |
Value |
%Share |
Value |
%Share |
|
| 1990-91 | 171,114 |
56,303 |
33 |
11,621 |
7 |
76,290 |
44 |
26,900 |
16 |
| 1991-92 | 229,889 |
96,453 |
42 |
15,167 |
7 |
88,791 |
38 |
29,478 |
13 |
| 1992-93 | 258,643 |
108,993 |
42 |
14,304 |
6 |
99,290 |
38 |
36,056 |
14 |
| 1993-94 | 258,250 |
97,301 |
38 |
15,692 |
6 |
110,291 |
43 |
34,966 |
13 |
| 1994-95 | 320,892 |
112,305 |
35 |
16,754 |
5 |
148,419 |
46 |
43,414 |
14 |
| 1995-96 | 397,575 |
140,405 |
35 |
22,541 |
6 |
180,539 |
45 |
54,090 |
14 |
| 1996-97 | 465,001 |
169,774 |
37 |
22,259 |
5 |
202,379 |
43 |
70,589 |
15 |
| 1997-98 | 436,338 |
139,618 |
32 |
23,344 |
5 |
195,528 |
45 |
77,848 |
18 |
| 1998-99 | 465,964 |
146,450 |
31 |
25,646 |
6 |
220,563 |
47 |
73,305 |
16 |
| July-March | |||||||||
| 1998-99 | 324,359 |
100,962 |
31 |
17,961 |
6 |
153,036 |
47 |
52,400 |
16 |
| 99-2000* | 388,069 |
101,357 |
26 |
22,391 |
6 |
206,076 |
53 |
58,245 |
15 |
* Provisional
Source: Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources |