| |
|
|
|
| For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles. |
|
|
|
Policy paradoxes
The government
policy governing the sugar industry has not been desirably conducive and was designed on
short run basis. Its adhoc administration has been one of the principal disruptive
influence casting factor. This fact can be deduced from four changes introduced in a
single year of import regime governing sugar. To begin badly with it, on July 07, 2000
custom duty on sugar import was out of context cut to just 15% from 35%, consisting of 25%
regulatory and 10% custom duties invoked on June 23, 2000. Ban on sugar import from India
imposed earlier due to its inferior quality and to defeat dumping design, was lifted on
August 29, 2000 maintaining the duty structure at 10%. This opened flood gate of flows of
inferior quality sugar at dumping prices. Ban on import of sugar from India was re-clamped
from March 07, 2001 extending cover of protection to letters of credit already
established. Its quantity was estimated at about 50,000 tons. But the actual flow surged
to 170,000 tons by August 2001, which inflicted devastating blows to sales and pickup of
sugar of the national industry. Ignoring this impact, it was all the more disconcerting to
find that custom duty on sugar import was reduced to 10% from June 18, 2001, on
announcement of the federal budget for fiscal year 2001-02. The PSMA consistently drew
attention of the authorities to syndrome of large sugar stocks pile up with the national
sugar industry. At long last on September 17, 2001 custom duty on sugar import was raised
to 20%. By that time much damage had already been suffered by the national sugar industry.
As of September 30, 2001 (2000) national sugar industry held a huge stock load of 620,648
(27,274) tons of sugar while the next crushing campaign was near by.
Import of sugar by its timing effect was extensively damaging during the sugar year of Oct
2000-Sep 2001 and also dragged its disruptive drain over the beginning of the succeeding
season, owing to huge sugar stocks at 621 thousand tons on September 30, 2001, normally
being of 2.5 months consumption.
Monthwise sugar imports
Month |
Volume in tons |
|
October |
2000 |
149,104 |
November |
2000 |
143,861 |
December |
2000 |
45,346 |
January |
2001 |
40,416 |
February |
2001 |
34,221 |
March |
2001 |
35,288 |
April |
2001 |
27,893 |
May |
2001 |
39,890 |
June |
2001 |
41,632 |
July |
2001 |
42,103 |
August |
2001 |
20,000 |
Source: Federal Bureau of
Statistics
Sugar availability during the year surging to 3,632 thousand tons, with unsold stock of
621 thousand tons piled up at end September 2001, both set a new undesirable record. It
was nerve-wrecking for the sugar industry, specially in arranging for its financing,
coinciding with rising incidence of debt servicing, increasing the average cost of sugar
sales of the industry. Usually, the stress of carrying charge tends to be ignored by the
authorities in zeal of expressing extra concern about sugar price, though it is a visible
component.
National sugar requirement, during the year on proper evaluation, was about 2.90 million
tons per annum, even by liberal estimation at per capita consumption of 22 kilogram in
Pakistan, much higher than in the neighbouring countries. For the 131.50 million souls
population of Pakistan, 2.9 million tons of sugar seemed sufficient. Availability
surpassed the requirement by hefty 25.24%, which invariably would cast shadow on price
line and eclipse earning scope aghast.
Sugar requirement
Province |
Population in million |
Sugar requirement million Tons |
Sindh |
29.90 |
0.66 |
Punjab |
73.00 |
1.61 |
NWFP |
18.00 |
0.40 |
Baluchistan |
6.60 |
0.14 |
Fata |
3.20 |
0.07 |
Capital territory |
0.80 |
0.01 |
Total |
131.50 |
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources |