| MIRZA SUGAR MILLS Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ANNUAL REPORT 2003 |
|
|
| COMPANY PROFILE |
|
| DR.( MRS.) FEHMIDA MIRZA |
|
Chairperson & Chief Executive |
|
| MIR GHULAMULLAH
TALPUR |
|
Chairman |
|
| MR. ARSH AD ABID
ABBASI |
|
| MS FAREHA ABID KAZI |
|
AUDITORS : |
|
| MIR FURQAN ALI
TALPUR |
|
| MIRZA SAUL AT RAZA |
|
| MR. ALI JAWAD JABIR
ANSARI |
|
| MR. ALI JAWAD JABIR ANSARI - |
|
| MIR GHULAMULLAH TALPUR - |
|
| MIRZA SAUL AT RAZA |
|
Member |
|
| MR. UMER B ASHIR |
|
SECRETARY&C.F.O : |
|
| M/s.KHALIDMAJID RAHMAN SARFARAZ |
|
Auditors |
|
| RAHIM IQBAL RAFIQ
& CO. |
|
| (CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS) |
|
| BANKERS TO THE
COMPANY |
|
| MUSLIM COMMERCIAL
BANK LTD. |
|
| ALLIED BANK OF
PAKISTAN LTD. |
|
| NATIONAL BANK OF
PAKISTAN |
|
| PICIC COMMERCIAL
BANK LTD. |
|
| DEHCHHAROTAPPO,LOWARISHARIFF |
|
MILLS |
|
| DISTRICT BADIN |
|
| SINDH |
|
|
| DIRECTORS' REPORT |
|
| Dear Shareholders, |
|
| Your directors are
pleased to present the Company's Annual Audited Financial Statements with
Auditors' Report |
|
| thereon for the
year ended September 30, 2003. |
|
| GENERAL |
|
| Periodic Quarterly
Directors Reports with Unaudited Accounts of the Company have already covered
a signifi- |
|
| cant portion of the
present report and major aspects of the operational and financial activities
of the Company. |
|
| Sugar Industry, the
vital economic organ of the economy after Textile Industry is passing through
a critical phase. |
|
| Once a milching cow
and a golden egg laying industry has been made to carry so much burden, that
at present, |
|
| only a handful of
the Mills are generating profit, while the majority of the mills are
suffering losses, some are |
|
| incurring huge
unbearable losses, which would choke their existence. |
|
| Your mill is also
one of such mill which is very strongly fighting the odds. |
|
| Presently there are
factors, which are affecting the Industry, borne out of Provincial
considerations. In Punjab the |
|
| Industry has been
able to keep up with the crisis, as there is ample sugarcane crop due to
water availability, |
|
| higher sugar price
by about Re. I/- per kg. compared to Sindh and lower sugarcane price fixed by
the Punjab |
|
| Government. The
shortage of sugar in Punjab has almost diminished. Previously, Sindh was a
net exporter of |
|
| sugar, this has not
changed but the export of sugar has been limited to new Punjab areas and
buying by TCP and |
|
| direct/indirect
exports to Afghanistan. Government of Sindh has positively responded to the
problems of Sindh |
|
| Sugar Industry.
There were certain concessions announced by the Government during the
reporting Season 2002- |
|
| 2003, wherein
sugarcane price was fixed at Rs. 43/- with split of payment in two parts i.e.
Rs. 40/- to be paid at the |
|
| time of delivery of
sugarcane and Rs. 3/- to be paid after the season was over. There were also
firm commitments |
|
| that mills would
not be forced to pay Quality Premium; however, government had to back out on
this issue due |
|
| to extensive
agriculture lobby out cry. The issue of Quality Premium is under litigation
at Supreme Court, the |
|
| Industry contending
Q.P. being not payable. |
|
| The Company is also
facing resistance from Banks/DFIs for recovery of their dues. All the
Banks/DFIs except for |
|
| ZTBL and SPCB, are
in courts. However, the company has applied to the Committee for Revival of
Sick Industrial |
|
| Units for
restructuring and also applied to all the Banks/DFIs for availing the
benefits offered under SBP Circular |
|
| BPD 29 of October
15, 2002. Company management is hopeful for a favourable outcome from the
above formus, |
|
| which would give
the company substantial leverage to overcome its financial difficulties and
to become a viable |
|
| unit. |
|
| The District Badin
has become prone to calamities. In last four years Badin has experienced
floods, draughts, |
|
| earthquake and
cyclone. There was unprecedented floods in Badin during end July beginning
August 2003. The |
|
| flood was men made
as Punjab had diverted its rain water and canal water into Left Bank Outfal
Drain (LBOD) |
|
| resulting in the
banks of the rivers and canals giving way causing heavy losses to lives and
properties. Your mill |
|
| also suffered,
however, due to adequate insurance coverage any major loss was averted. |
|
| The company has
fought all odds against its existence and valiantly being able to survive.
Company has arranged |
|
| financial resources
to operate the mills from unconventional sources and kept itself as a going
concern. |
|
|
| PERFORMANCE REVIEW |
|
|
|
|
| The operating
results of your company for the season are as under :- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-2003 |
2001-2002 |
|
| Season started |
|
|
20-12-2002 |
12-11-2001 |
|
| Season closed |
|
|
08-04-2003 |
24-03-2002 |
|
| Days worked |
|
|
110 |
133 |
|
| Sugarcane crushing |
|
(Tons) |
288,080 |
208,628 |
|
|
(Maunds) |
7,718,295 |
5,589,605 |
|
| Sugar recovery |
|
(%) |
9.841 |
10.01 |
|
| Sugar production |
|
(Tons) |
28,350 |
20,885 |
|
| Molasses recovery |
|
(%) |
5.458 |
5.314 |
|
| Molasses production |
|
(Tons) |
15,726 |
11,089 |
|
| You will note that
the company has been able to produce and crush more sugar and sugarcane due
to availability |
|
| factor. Due to
flood aftermath, the ensuing season seems to be less productive. |
|
|
| FINANCIAL RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
2002-2003 |
2001-2002 |
|
| Loss for the year |
|
|
-84,256,531 |
-102,122,290 |
|
| Provision for
taxation |
|
231,930 |
-1,676,578 |
|
|
|
|
-84,024,601 |
-103,798,868 |
|
| Accumulated loss brought |
forward |
|
-579,388,561 |
-475,589,693 |
|
| Accumulated loss carried |
forward |
|
-663,413,162 |
-579,388,561 |
|
|
| Financial results
are better than previous year, however, loss to the entire industry emanates
from the higher |
|
| fixation of
sugarcane support price and provision of Quality Premium (QP) at unreasonable
lower Bench mark |
|
| recovery factor of
8.7%. Your company is contesting the QP matter of the last season in the
Supreme Court, |
|
| however, provision
for the Q.P. has been incorporated in the accounts. |
|
| SEASON 2003-2004 |
|
| The next season is
expected to commence from beginning of December 2003. There were extensive
crop damages |
|
| due to flood in
July-August-2003. Sugarcane crop has also suffered losses, however, we are
hopeful for about the |
|
| matching crushing
of last year, as upper Sindh areas have benefitted from the rains. |
|
| There is also
another positive factor, that of, sugar cane price which has been reduced by
Rs. 2/- per maund |
|
| compared to last
year's Rs. 43/-. Government has also avoided to notify Q.P. which means there
is realisation of |
|
| the looming crisis
in the Sugar Industry. Both the above factors would benefit the industry to
overcome losses. |
|
| TCP has also been
given authorisation to procure excess quantity of sugar to facilitate in the
financial difficulties |
|
| of the sugar mills.
These steps would prove well for the Industry. |
|
| HEALTH, SAFETY AND
ENVIRONMENT |
|
| Appropriate
facilities existed for safeguarding the health of employees in accordance
with the Factories Act 1948 |
|
| and National
Environment Quality Standard (N.E.Q.S.) for Sugar Industry. |
|
|
| INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY |
|
| Improvement and
up-gradation of the existing instruments are being continuously made to coupe
with the |
|
| requirements of
technological advancement in this field. |
|
| AUDIT REPORT |
|
| The Audit Report
for the year under review contains certain qualifications, which are being
addressed as follows |
|
| 1. The management of the Company has
initiated a program to avail the scheme under SBP Circular No. 29 |
|
| of October 15, 2002
for settlement of Banks/DFIs dues. For this purpose, the company is pursuing
all |
|
| Banks and DFIs for
making arrangements to include our company for availing the benefits. Further
the |
|
| management is
endeavouring to mitigate the present unfavourable financial condition by
arranging Rs. |
|
| 30.00 million for
the ensuing crushing season. The Company's ability to continue as a going
concern is |
|
| being watched
carefully, all events affecting the going concern basis are under constant
review. |
|
| 2. Sugar Industry in Sindh is facing acute
financial crises due to paucity of sugarcane. Furthermore, the |
|
| company is
operating seasonally for about 130 to 150 days in a year, depending on the
availability of |
|
| sugarcane and as
such the plant is operating at about 50% capacity. Therefore, employees are
requested |
|
| to avail their
accumulated absence during off season. Nevertheless, employees are laid off
during off |
|
| season to save
employees cost. In the opinion of management, the matter as mentioned in the
audit |
|
| report, is not
material to warrant the disclosure under IAS-19. |
|
| 3. The Instirute of Chartered Accountants
of Pakistan and Banks/DFIs have an understanding in the matter |
|
| of direct
confirmation by Banks and DFIs, we cannot influence the Banks and DFIs for
confirmation. |
|
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
| There has been no
change so far in the Board of Directors since after its constitution through
Election of Directors |
|
| on February 27,
2003. |
|
| AUDITORS |
|
| The present
auditors - M/s. Khalid Majid Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq & Co.,
Chartered Accountants, |
|
| retire and offer
their services for the ensuing year. |
|
| The Board's Audit
Committee has recommended their appointment for the ensuing year. |
|
| CODE OF CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE |
|
| The Company has
adopted the Code of Corporate Governance promulgated by the Securities
Exchange Commis- |
|
| sion of Pakistan.
We have implemented the major mandatory provisions and welcome the government
step to |
|
| more fully disclose
and monitor the corporate sector. We hope it will go a long way in confidence
building of |
|
| small investors and
will boost corporate investment. |
|
| STATEMENT OF
CORPORATE AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FRAME WORK |
|
| a. The financial statements, prepared by
the management of the Company, present fairly its state of affairs, |
|
| the result of its
operations, cash flows and changes in equity. |
|
| b. Proper books of accounts of the company
have been maintained. |
|
| c. Appropriate accounting policies have
been consistently applied in preparation of financial statements |
|
| and accounting
estimates are based on reasonable and prudent judgement. |
|
| d. International Accounting Standards, as
applicable in Pakistan have been followed in preparation of |
|
| financial
statements and any departure therefrom has been adequatley disclosed. |
|
|
| e. The system of internal control, which
was in place, is sound in design and has been effectively imple- |
|
| mented and
monitored. However, it is being continuously reviewed by internal audit and
other officers |
|
| handling such
procedures. The process of review will continue and any weaknesses in
controls will be |
|
| removed. The
function of Internal Audit has been implemented and operating successfully. |
|
|
| f. The Company's ability to continue as a
going concern is being watched carefully, all events affecting the |
|
| going concern basis
are under constant review. |
|
|
| g. There has been no material departure
from the best practices of corporate governance, as detailed in the |
|
| listing regulations. |
|
|
| h. Key operating and financial data for last
six (6) years in summarized form is annexed. |
|
|
| i. Outstanding taxes and levies are being
accrued and paid as per law. |
|
|
| j. Value of investments based on audited
accounts of Provident Fund is Rs. 2.180 million. |
|
|
| k. During the year 5 (five) meetings of the
Board of Directors were held. Attendance by each Director is as |
|
| follows : |
|
|
| Name of Director |
|
No. of Meetings Attended |
|
| Dr. (Mrs) Fehmihda
Mirza |
|
3 |
|
| Mir Ghulamulla
Talpur |
|
6 |
|
| Mr. Arshad Abid
Abbasi |
|
- |
|
| Ms Fareha Abid Kazi |
|
- |
|
| Mir Furqan Ali
Talpur |
|
5 |
|
| Mirza Saulat Raza |
|
6 |
|
| Mr. Ali Jawad Jabir
Ansari |
|
4 |
|
| Mr. Gul Nawaz
N.I.T. (Retired) |
|
1 |
|
|
| 1. The pattern of shareholding is annexed. |
|
| m. Because of the loss sustained by the
Company during the year under review, the Company has not |
|
| declared any
dividend or issued bonus shares for the year. |
|
| n. There was no trading in shares of MSML
held by its directors, CEO, their spouses and minor children. |
|
| o. The operating results as compared to last
year are showing an improvement in turnover by 27.80% and |
|
| the operating loss
of Rs. 36.493 million has been reduced to Rs. 5.922 million. The main reason
for which |
|
| is increase in
turnover and lower cost of sugar cane. Price of sugar was adverse. |
|
| FUTURE PROSPECTS |
|
| There are positive
developments in the Government and Financial Circles. |
|
| Government has
realised the burden on the sugar mills and has taken the bold decision of
lowering the sugarcane |
|
| support price and
doing away with QP for the first time since Pakistan coming into being. This
is a very big boost |
|
| to the Industry.
This step may make most of the mills viable. |
|
| The other step of
allowing TCP to procure sugar for establishing a buffer would also go a long
way in helping the |
|
| industry from zig
zag trends in sugar price. |
|
|
| PATTERN OF
SHAREHOLDINGS |
|
|
|
|
| AS AT 30TH
SEPTEMBER 2003 |
|
|
|
|
| Number of |
|
Shareholding |
Total Shares |
Percentage |
|
| Share Holders |
From |
To |
Held |
|
|
| 321 |
1 |
100 |
32,100 |
0.23 |
|
| 1,127 |
101 |
500 |
561,530 |
3.98 |
|
| 55 |
501 |
1000 |
54,700 |
0.39 |
|
| 95 |
1001 |
5000 |
286,400 |
2.03 |
|
| 39 |
5001 |
10000 |
326,000 |
2.31 |
|
| 12 |
10001 |
15000 |
160,100 |
1.14 |
|
| 32 |
15001 |
20000 |
615,700 |
4.37 |
|
| 12 |
20001 |
25000 |
288,500 |
2.05 |
|
| 3 |
25001 |
30000 |
88,000 |
0.62 |
|
| 3 |
30001 |
35000 |
96,900 |
0.69 |
|
| 3 |
35001 |
40000 |
116,200 |
0.82 |
|
| 1 |
40001 |
45000 |
45,000 |
0.32 |
|
| 10 |
45001 |
55000 |
502,500 |
3.56 |
|
| 5 |
55001 |
60000 |
300,000 |
2.13 |
|
| 3 |
65001 |
70000 |
210,000 |
1.49 |
|
| 2 |
75001 |
80000 |
160,000 |
1.13 |
|
| 1 |
90001 |
95000 |
90,900 |
0.64 |
|
| 14 |
95001 |
100000 |
1,400,000 |
9.93 |
|
| 2 |
135001 |
140000 |
275,600 |
1.95 |
|
| 5 |
145001 |
150000 |
746,000 |
5.29 |
|
| 1 |
195001 |
200000 |
200,000 |
1.42 |
|
| 1 |
230001 |
235000 |
233,500 |
1.66 |
|
| 1 |
245001 |
250000 |
250,000 |
1.77 |
|
| 1 |
260001 |
265000 |
262,090 |
1.86 |
|
| 1 |
265001 |
270000 |
269,800 |
1.91 |
|
| 1 |
295001 |
300000 |
300,000 |
2.13 |
|
| 3 |
375001 |
380000 |
1,439,400 |
10.21 |
|
| 1 |
495001 |
500000 |
499,220 |
3.54 |
|
| 1 |
745001 |
750000 |
748,800 |
5.31 |
|
| 1 |
895001 |
900000 |
900,000 |
6.38 |
|
| 1 |
1260001 |
1265000 |
1,261,060 |
8.94 |
|
| 1 |
1375001 |
1380000 |
1,380,000 |
9.79 |
|
| 1759 |
|
14,100,000 |
100 |
|
|
| Categories of
Shareholders |
|
Share Held |
|
| Directors, CEO and
their Spouses and minor |
|
|
|
| Children. |
|
|
|
| Dr. (Mrs.) Fehmida
Mirza (Chief Executive) |
|
1,380,000 |
|
| Mir. Ghulamullah
Jaipur (Director) |
|
200,000 |
|
| Mr. Arshad Abid
Abbasi (Director) |
|
100,000 |
|
| Ms. Fareha Abid
Kazi (Director) |
|
100,000 |
|
| Mir Furqan Ali
Jaipur (Director) |
|
9,000 |
|
| Mirza Saulat Raza
(Director) |
|
8,500 |
|
| Mr. Ali Jawad Jabir
Ansari |
|
5,000 |
|
| Dr. Zulfiqar Ali
Mirza (Husband Dr. (Mrs.) Fehmida Mirza) |
380,000 |
|
| Executives |
|
- |
|
| Public sector
companies and corporations |
|
- |
|
| Banks, Development
Finance Institutions, |
|
|
|
| Non-Banking Finance
Institutions, Insurance |
|
|
|
| Companies,
Modarabas and mutual funds. |
|
|
|
| Muslim Commercial
Bank Ltd. |
|
146,000 |
|
| National Bank of
Pakistan (Former NDFC) |
|
900,000 |
|
| The Bank of Punjab |
|
17,500 |
|
| State Life
Insurance Corp. of Pakistan |
|
150,000 |
|
| National Insurance
Company Limited |
|
100,000 |
|
| EFU General
Insurance Limited |
|
15,500 |
|
| Shareholders
holding ten percent or more voting |
|
- |
|
| interest in the
listed company |
|
|
|
| Joint Stock
Companies |
|
|
|
| Asonix Ind. (Pvt)
Ltd. |
|
233,500 |
|
| Sarfaraz Mahmood
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
500 |
|
| Moosa, Noor Mohd,
Shahzad Co. (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
52,500 |
|
| Salman Services
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
22,000 |
|
| Javed Omer Vohra
& Company Ltd. |
|
5,500 |
|
| First Capital
Equities Limited |
|
500 |
|
| Aziz Fida Husain
& Company (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
2,000 |
|
| Y.S. Securities
& Services (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
1,000 |
|
| Zahid Latif Khan
Securities (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
5,000 |
|
| Continental Capital
Management (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
2,000 |
|
| Darson Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
14,500 |
|
| Ace Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
9,500 |
|
| Salim Chamdia
Securities (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
14,500 |
|
| Munaf Sattar
Securities (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
2,000 |
|
| M.S. Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
15,000 |
|
| M.R.A. Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
12,500 |
|
| Bawa Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
500 |
|
| Zillion Capital
Securities (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
20,000 |
|
| A.H.K.D. Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
5,000 |
|
| Time Securities
(Pvt) Ltd. |
|
1,000 |
|
| Jahangir Siddiqui
Capital Mkts (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
2,000 |
|
| Others |
|
|
|
| The Karachi Stock
Exchange (G) Ltd. |
|
30,500 |
|
| Invest &
Finance Securities (Pvt) Ltd. |
|
6,000 |
|
| Individual |
|
3,462,230 |
|
| TOTAL |
|
|
14,100,000 |
|
|
| SIX YEARS DATA AT A
GLANCE |
|
|
|
Rupees in Thousand |
|
| PARTICULARS |
|
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
| FINANCIAL DATA |
|
|
| 1 Financial Position |
|
|
| Paid up Capital |
|
141,000 |
141,000 |
141,000 |
141,000 |
141,000 |
141,000 |
|
| Accumulated(Loss)/Profit |
-663,413 |
-579,389 |
-475,590 |
-479,161 |
-279,011 |
-226,920 |
|
| Long term Loan |
|
653,733 |
663,888 |
678,492 |
690,948 |
124,651 |
183,108 |
|
| Liabilities Against
Assets |
|
|
| subject to Finance Lease |
. |
120 |
252 |
508 |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Fixed Assets (At Cost) |
. |
689,013 |
725,219 |
727,055 |
700,841 |
678,222 |
668,360 |
|
| Accumulated
Depreciation |
336,439 |
313,955 |
270,284 |
222,068 |
169,342 |
144,200 |
|
| Long term
Advance/Deposits |
1,622 |
1,478 |
1,493 |
1,701 |
1,679 |
2,937 |
|
| Current Assets |
|
58,273 |
44,976 |
45,180 |
58,574 |
134,651 |
149,646 |
|
| Current Liabilities |
|
281,208 |
232,142 |
159,032 |
191,167 |
661,126 |
581,539 |
|
| 2 Income |
|
|
|
| Sales |
|
426,298 |
333,546 |
578,710 |
358,882 |
600,130 |
703,543 |
|
| Gross Profit/(Loss) |
-5,923 |
-36,494 |
85,785 |
-46,675 |
55,286 |
50,000 |
|
| Other Income |
|
- |
18,443 |
3,922 |
13 |
15 |
- |
|
| Pre-Tax
(Loss)/Profit |
-84,257 |
('102,122) |
3,952 |
-204,317 |
-47,020 |
-106,388 |
|
| Taxation |
|
231 |
1,677 |
3,548 |
-4,168 |
5,071 |
- |
|
| 3 Statistics and Ratios |
|
|
| Gross Profit/(Loss) to Sales |
% |
-1.39 |
-10.94 |
14.82 |
-13.01 |
9.21 |
7.11 |
|
| Pre-tax Profit/(Loss) to Sales |
% |
-19.76 |
-30.62 |
0.68 |
-56.93 |
-7.83 |
-15.12 |
|
| Pre-Tax Profit/(Loss) to Capital |
% |
-59.76 |
-72.43 |
2.8 |
-144.91 |
-33.35 |
-75.45 |
|
| Current Ratio |
|
1:4.83 |
1:5.16 |
1:3.52 |
1:3.26 |
1:4.91 |
1:3.89 |
|
| Paid-up Value per
Share |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
| Earnings after Tax
per Share |
-5.96 |
-7.36 |
0.61 |
-14.19 |
. (2.13) |
-7.55 |
|
| Cash Dividend |
|
- |
- |
5,000 |
- |
- |
_ |
|
| Market Value per
Share |
2.5 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
2 |
1.5 |
|
| OPERATING DATA |
|
|
| Season Started |
|
20-12-2002 |
12.11.2001 |
08.11.2000 |
29.10.1999 |
19.11.98 |
07.11.97 |
|
| Season Closed |
|
08-04-2003 |
24.03.2002 |
19.03.2001 |
29.02.2000 |
10.04.99 |
10.04.98 |
|
| Days Worked |
|
110 |
133 |
132 |
124 |
143 |
155 |
|
| Sugarcane Crushed |
288,080 |
208,628 |
276,103 |
252,626 |
399,953 |
414,156 |
|
| Sugarcane Crushed |
7,718,295 |
5,589,605 |
7,397,402 |
6,768,398 |
10,715,621 |
11,096,152 |
|
| Sugar Recovery |
% |
9.841 |
10.01 |
9.826 |
9.512 |
9.722 |
10.9 |
|
| Sugar Production |
|
28,350 |
20,885 |
27,122 |
24,033 |
38,919 |
45,045 |
|
| Molasses Recovery |
% |
5.458 |
5.314 |
5.316 |
4.789 |
5 |
4.86 |
|
| Molasses Production |
15,726 |
11,089 |
14,675 |
12,102 |
20,012 |
20,080 |
|
|
| REVIEW REPORT TO
THE MEMBERS ON STATEMENT |
|
| OF COMPLIANCE WITH
BEST PRACTICES OF |
|
| CODE OF CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE |
|
| We have reviewed
the Statement of Compliance with the best practices contained in the Code of
Corporate |
|
| Governance prepared
by the Board of Directors of Mirza Sugar Mills Limited to comply with the
Listing |
|
| Regulations No. 37
and Chapter XIII of the Karachi and Lahore Stock Exchanges where the Company
is listed. |
|
| The responsibility
for compliance with the Code of Corporate Governance is that of the Board of
Directors of the |
|
| Company. Our
responsibility is to review, to the extent where such compliance can be
objectively verified, |
|
| whether the
Statement of Compliance reflects the status of the Company's compliance with
the provisions of the |
|
| Code of Corporate
Governance and report if it does not. A review is limited primarily to
inquiries of the |
|
| Company personnel
and review of various documents prepared by the Company to comply with the
Code. |
|
| As part of our
audit of financial statements we are required to obtain an understanding of
the accounting and |
|
| internal control
systems sufficient to plan the audit and develop an effective audit approach.
We have not carried |
|
| out any special
review of the internal control system to enable us to express an opinion as
to whether the Board's |
|
| statement on
internal control covers all controls and the effectiveness of such internal
controls. |
|
| Based on our review
nothing has come to our attention which causes us to believe that the
Statement of Compli- |
|
| ance does not
appropriately reflect the Company's compliance, in all material respects,
with the best practices |
|
| contained in the
Code of Corporate Governance as applicable for the year ended on September
30, 2003. |
|
|
| 16. The meetings of the audit committee were
held at least once every quarter prior to approval of interim and |
|
| final results of
the Company and as required by the Code. The terms of reference of the
committee have been |
|
| formed and advised
to the committee for compliance. |
|
| 17. The Board has set-up effective internal
audit function. |
|
| 18. The statutory auditors of the Company have
confirmed that they have been given a satisfactory rating under |
|
| the quality control
review programme of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan, that
they or any |
|
| of the partners of
the firm, their spouses and minor children do not hold shares of the Company
and that the |
|
| firm and all its
partners are in compliance with International Federation of Accountants (IF
AC) guidelines on |
|
| code of ethics as
adopted by Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan. |
|
| 19. The statutory auditors or the persons
associated with them have not been appointed to provide other services |
|
| except in
accordance with the listing regulations and the auditors have confirmed that
they have observed |
|
| IF AC guidelines in
this regard. |
|
| 20^ As there is no related party transaction, the statement regarding
Transfer Pricing, in pursuance of SECP |
|
| directive as
communicated by Karachi Stock Exchange (Guarantee) Ltd. vide its Notice No.
KSE/N-5260 |
|
| dated November 5,
2003, is not applicable to our Company. |
|
| 21. We confirm that all other material
principles contained in the Code have been complied with. |
|
|
| AUDITORS' REPORT TO
THE MEMBERS |
|
| We have audited the
annexed balance sheet of MIRZA SUGAR MILLS LIMITED as at September 30, 2003
and the |
|
| related profit and
loss account, cash flow statement and statement of changes in equity together
with the notes |
|
| forming part
thereof, for the year then ended and we state that we have obtained all the
information and explana- |
|
| tions which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of our
audit. |
|
| It is the
responsibility of the Company's management to establish and maintain a system
of internal control, and |
|
| prepare and present
the above said statements in conformity with the approved accounting
standards and the |
|
| requirements of the
Companies Ordinance, 1984. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these statements |
|
| based on our audit. |
|
| We conducted our
audit in accordance with the auditing standards as applicable in Pakistan.
These standards |
|
|